| Pages:
1
2 |
GH Mumm Purchase any 750mL bottle of G.H. Mumm (excludes Mumm Marlborough and Mumm Tasmania 750ml range), from any store... |
|
|
|
posted 20-11-2024 @ 10:26 AM
|
|
www
|
|
Can anyone help with participating stores yet please |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 20-11-2024 @ 10:46 AM
|
|
www
|
|
I found bottles with neck tags at Ritchies Liquor |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 20-11-2024 @ 10:46 AM
|
|
www
|
|
We have promo stuff at the Bottle O |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 20-11-2024 @ 11:19 AM
|
|
www
|
|
Thank you for the replies, sadly neither of those anywhere near me but it gives me an idea of which outlets to try |
|
|
Celticcomper1969
|
|
posted 10-12-2024 @ 06:39 PM
|
|
www
|
|
I remember it well, as it was one of the few times I spent $49 on an entry for an alcohol purchase. (Non-drinker) awarded to a creative entry, the
whole thing was very fishy.😡 |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 09:44 AM
|
|
www
|
|
I was always under the impression that promoters had to oblidge to their T&C's as they can be reported to that 'gaming authority?' (forgot what
their called) .... otherwise if we can't beat thm join them and we too submitt similar creatives as I feel this would make it fair-game.
Quote: Originally posted by gailg  |
Agree, especially since it's quite an expensive purchase.
From my memory it was an elaborate diorama in a suitcase situation that was the cause of the drama? The backlash was huge. Hopefully this promoter
learnt their lesson not to be roped into that kind of debacle again.
But it's also a timely reminder (especially for the newbies but also everyone) that if you are entering big value competitions and entering as per
Ts&Cs, don't assume promoters are also going to stick to their end of the bargain. It's always worth a quick email to them beforehand mentioning
these past events and seeking reassurance the Ts&Cs will be adhered to. Too many times we have seen these underhanded methods wow these promoters
into giving them the prize, and then the disappointment and outrage that follows. Sometimes these competitions also require an expensive purchase,
which is hardly fair when you have made said purchase in good faith, followed the Ts&Cs, and then it seems you never had a chance. It's usually
high value/holiday comps with a WOL component, but draw comps don't escape either - the usual suspects will give anything a go if they think they can
get one "under the radar".
The lovely lottoer itspossible is a big advocate for this, and always posts the replies received from the promoters on the comps that she contacts. We
just can't always rely on her to do this though, as she doesn't enter and make contact on every single comp.
I'd encourage everyone to take the initiative to send those emails to the promoters - it's the only way to ensure it's an even playing field and the
winner is selected from the entry method per the Ts&Cs only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 09:57 AM
|
|
www
|
|
$124.95 at Dan Murphy's ... I won't be entering that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 10:06 AM
|
|
www
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Calliope |
I was always under the impression that promoters had to oblidge to their T&C's as they can be reported to that 'gaming authority?' (forgot what
their called) .... otherwise if we can't beat thm join them and we too submitt similar creatives as I feel this would make it fair-game.
| Quote: Originally posted by gailg |
Agree, especially since it's quite an expensive purchase.
From my memory it was an elaborate diorama in a suitcase situation that was the cause of the drama? The backlash was huge. Hopefully this promoter
learnt their lesson not to be roped into that kind of debacle again.
But it's also a timely reminder (especially for the newbies but also everyone) that if you are entering big value competitions and entering as per
Ts&Cs, don't assume promoters are also going to stick to their end of the bargain. It's always worth a quick email to them beforehand mentioning
these past events and seeking reassurance the Ts&Cs will be adhered to. Too many times we have seen these underhanded methods wow these promoters
into giving them the prize, and then the disappointment and outrage that follows. Sometimes these competitions also require an expensive purchase,
which is hardly fair when you have made said purchase in good faith, followed the Ts&Cs, and then it seems you never had a chance. It's usually
high value/holiday comps with a WOL component, but draw comps don't escape either - the usual suspects will give anything a go if they think they can
get one "under the radar".
The lovely lottoer itspossible is a big advocate for this, and always posts the replies received from the promoters on the comps that she contacts. We
just can't always rely on her to do this though, as she doesn't enter and make contact on every single comp.
I'd encourage everyone to take the initiative to send those emails to the promoters - it's the only way to ensure it's an even playing field and the
winner is selected from the entry method per the Ts&Cs only.
|
|
When the Promoter makes a mistake and gets carried away with a creative mailed in entry and they are publicly called out on it they go into panic mode
and the final outcome is that they then claim that the creative entry just happened to have the best 25 wol as well as judged by them. This is of
course rubbish because I've seen one of the 25 wol that they then published as the winner and it was very ordinary indeed. One of the good creative
model makers is not similarly skilled at writing the words. It was several years ago now and I can't remember which competition it was unfortunately.
Mind you none of us object when the terms and conditions are not adhered to when there is a benefit to us. e.g. they allow the trip for example to be
extended or changed but that's only one example.
 |
|
|
PetElf77
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 02:24 PM
|
|
www
|
|
Thank you for posting Squirrelena. And Happy New Year All 😁🥳
Has anyone seen this advertised at a premise other than Bottle O or Ritchies? I don’t have either of these options near me. Thanks. |
|
|
wonderstuff
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 02:58 PM
|
|
www
|
|
The former Lottoer who mailed in was very open about her strategy. I say former, but is probably here under a different name. Her husband used to work
in the field and as such would create the music boxes as it was his profession. She said she would call the promoter and ask if they’d accept mail in
entries. She was pushing the rules, but I do think the responsibility lies with the promoter to not allow it.
However there’s certainly something fishy about it all. 😉 |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 05:39 PM
|
|
www
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by wonderstuff | The former Lottoer who mailed in was very open about her strategy. I say former, but is probably here under a different name. Her husband used to work
in the field and as such would create the music boxes as it was his profession. She said she would call the promoter and ask if they’d accept mail in
entries. She was pushing the rules, but I do think the responsibility lies with the promoter to not allow it.
However there’s certainly something fishy about it all. 😉 |
The buck stops with the Promoter. They should not give any advantage to an individual entrant prior to the draw. They were magnificent creations the
ones I saw years ago and they have a definite place in competitions that require a physical creative type of entry.
.. |
|
|
wonderstuff
|
|
posted 2-1-2025 @ 07:38 PM
|
|
www
|
|
I agree it does. However the strategy was to enter ones that were not advertised as mail in creatives. But yes, promoter is ultimately responsible. |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 3-1-2025 @ 12:08 AM
|
|
www
|
|
Anyone remember the QUIKSILVER or BILLABONG COMP, can't remember exactly from years ago? It was a 25WOL answer that you filled in in store and put in
the "barrel". The lottoer at the time took a creative entry down to Torquay and handed it in...I might add there were several. They won a car!!! There
was such a kerfuffle. She had all her relatives sign up to lottos and support the "illegal" entry. It was very disappointing. |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 3-1-2025 @ 04:03 PM
|
|
www
|
|
Has anyone found this with the compeition advertised? I'm in WA and haven't seen any adverts for the comp
|
|
|
|
|
|
posted 3-1-2025 @ 04:22 PM
|
|
www
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by kismet | | Anyone remember the QUIKSILVER or BILLABONG COMP, can't remember exactly from years ago? It was a 25WOL answer that you filled in in store and put in
the "barrel". The lottoer at the time took a creative entry down to Torquay and handed it in...I might add there were several. They won a car!!! There
was such a kerfuffle. She had all her relatives sign up to lottos and support the "illegal" entry. It was very disappointing. |
Pretty sure it was the QUICKSILVER comp kismet 😊
I agree with wonderstuff,it was very fishy 😂😂😂 |
|
|
wonderstuff
|
|
posted 3-1-2025 @ 08:05 PM
|
|
www
|
|
ReallyAddicted
Did you see the news article that occurred??
Fishy indeed!! |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 3-1-2025 @ 08:47 PM
|
|
www
|
|
Yep sure did 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
|
|
wonderstuff
|
|
posted 3-1-2025 @ 09:16 PM
|
|
www
|
|
Maybe it was you who told me!! 😂
Ribbit! |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 14-1-2025 @ 12:59 PM
|
|
www
|
|
Major Draw at 12 noon today good luck everyone
Wins for 2011: $12,235.25
Wins for 2012: $2034
Wins for 2013: $9740.50
Wins for 2014: $15755.07
Wins for 2015: $7249.60
Wins for 2016: $2697.60
Wins for 2017: $5846.66
Wins for 2018: $6628.12
Wins for 2019: $5024
Wins for 2020: $3754.56
Wins for 2021: $5534.35
Wins for 2022: $5049.69
Wins for 2023: $3398.05
Wins for 2024: $48717.32
|
|
|
Mel-Syd
|
|
posted 14-1-2025 @ 05:34 PM
|
|
www
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by gailg |
Agree, especially since it's quite an expensive purchase.
From my memory it was an elaborate diorama in a suitcase situation that was the cause of the drama? The backlash was huge. Hopefully this promoter
learnt their lesson not to be roped into that kind of debacle again.
But it's also a timely reminder (especially for the newbies but also everyone) that if you are entering big value competitions and entering as per
Ts&Cs, don't assume promoters are also going to stick to their end of the bargain. It's always worth a quick email to them beforehand mentioning
these past events and seeking reassurance the Ts&Cs will be adhered to. Too many times we have seen these underhanded methods wow these promoters
into giving them the prize, and then the disappointment and outrage that follows. Sometimes these competitions also require an expensive purchase,
which is hardly fair when you have made said purchase in good faith, followed the Ts&Cs, and then it seems you never had a chance. It's usually
high value/holiday comps with a WOL component, but draw comps don't escape either - the usual suspects will give anything a go if they think they can
get one "under the radar".
The lovely lottoer itspossible is a big advocate for this, and always posts the replies received from the promoters on the comps that she contacts. We
just can't always rely on her to do this though, as she doesn't enter and make contact on every single comp.
I'd encourage everyone to take the initiative to send those emails to the promoters - it's the only way to ensure it's an even playing field and the
winner is selected from the entry method per the Ts&Cs only.
|
I wondered why there were posts saying promoter has been contacted about keeping to their t & c.
It all makes sense now. Thanks for sharing. |
|
|
|
|
|
posted 19-1-2025 @ 10:43 AM
|
|
www
|
|
Any winners? |
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
